V Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 10:12:17AM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé napsal(a): > On Mon, Sep 18, 2023 at 09:57:28AM +0200, Petr Pisar wrote: > > V Fri, Sep 15, 2023 at 01:27:23PM -0400, Colin Walters napsal(a): > > > To state the blindingly obvious thing, RHEL made a decision to centralize on > > > Gitlab. Having Fedora be on pagure creates IMO unnecessary friction for me. > > > I would be quite curious to get some sort of survey of other engineers for > > > how they feel. > > > > My selfishly preferable option is not to use Gitlab.com for Fedora exactly > > because RHEL uses Gitlab.com. The reason is very practical: You need separate > > accounts for the two projects and GitLab.com is not good at using multiple > > accounts simulatenously. Having different systems makes to problem go away and > > my life easier. > > You don't require separate accounts. It is a choice developers can > make to keep their upstream vs RHEL work in gitlab.com separated, > or under the same account. There are pros & cons, so it is really > a matter of personal preference. > It's is a matter of security. With a single account you give Fedora admins an access to RHEL and vice versa. -- Petr
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
