Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 11 2023 at 08:00:29 AM -0400, Solomon Peachy via devel <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Not to retread old drama, but doesn't Fedora now rely on a proprietary
version of Gitlab?

No? All of our packages are on https://src.fedoraproject.org/ and our Fedora-specific source code goes on https://pagure.io/. These are both Pagure, not GitLab. It is open source.

I think we *should* move to GitLab, but only if it's an open source GitLab instance like most other major open source projects use (GNOME, KDE, freedesktop.org, Debian, etc.) We should not depend on proprietary services to build Fedora unless there is no suitable alternative, and there are *many* suitable alternatives here. This is core to Fedora's mission and identity. It wouldn't be strategic to compromise on this.

Michael

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux