Re: An update on RHEL moving to issues.redhat.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Sep 9, 2023 at 1:05 AM Brendan Conoboy <blc@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> RHEL making this change does not imply or require that Fedora do the same.

I am neither suggesting Fedora should do so, or
not do so, but just as a hypothetical, should Fedora
choose to do so, do you know if RedHat would be
amenable for such use of issues.redhat.com for
Fedora bug tracking(*).

My concern is that especially for packages that end
up being both in Fedora, and in EPEL (of which I
have a few) there are occasionally tightly related
RHEL issues, and the advantages of having "one
pane of glass" to follow the dependencies has
had some advantages for me personally.




(*) I am not a strong fan of jira, but neither am I
a strong fan of bugzilla.  Both have certain
goodness, and badness, and ugliness.  But
they both mostly work.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux