On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 8:35 AM Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Jun 5, 2023 at 6:28 AM Debarshi Ray via devel
<devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I wanted to wrap up this sub-thread on-list, after Owen and I chatted
> about it off-list.
>
> I am fine with having the fedora-toolbox OCI images being defined as
> kickstart files in the Fedora infrastructure and built by ImageFactory
> and published as another base image, just like the fedora base image
> currently is.
Just an FYI, but we're trying to move away from ImageFactory in the
general sense. I'm not sure if/how that will manifest itself in
Fedora, but ImageFactory is pretty terrible for debugging things when
it goes wrong. The options we're looking at elsewhere are Image
Builder, OSBS2, and RHTAP.
If we want to move Fedora images to ImageBuilder, then the right thing to do here is still to merge the toolbox image into fedora-kickstarts and then work on migrating that, rather than have it be a one-off outlier. (*)
(*) Yes, I know Fedora-IOT uses ImageBuilder. but in the context of the main Fedora compose.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
