Re: F39 Proposal: Make Toolbx a release-blocking deliverable and have release-blocking test criteria (System-Wide Change)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I'm broadly in favor here, some comments in line...

...snip...
> First, we want to ensure that there are up to date
> [https://src.fedoraproject.org/container/fedora-toolbox
> fedora-toolbox] OCI images published on
> [https://registry.fedoraproject.org/ registry.fedoraproject.org] as
> release-blocking deliverables at critical points in the development
> schedule, just like the installation ISOs for the Editions from
> [https://download.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/
> download.fedoraproject.org].  This must at least happen when an
> upcoming Fedora release is branched from Rawhide, and for the Beta and
> Final release candidates.  If possible, they should be updated more
> frequently as part of the nightly composes.  We do not expect this to
> happen after a Fedora release has gone GA.

In order to do this at branch point, we will need to move building this
image into the compose process and mark it blocking. Which hopefully we
can do. ;) 

...snip...
> It will be beneficial to consider the
> [https://src.fedoraproject.org/container/fedora-toolbox
> fedora-toolbox] images as release-blocking deliverables because
> Fedora's [https://opencontainers.org/ OCI] infrastructure is often
> broken.  Here are [https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11092 two]
> [https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11367 recent] examples of <code>fedpkg
> container-build</code> not working.  In the second case, it was
> preventing the images from being rebuilt to pull in an
> [https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2170878 important]
> bug-fix.  The broken infrastructure prevents regular Fedora
> contributors from jumping in to rebuild and publish the images at
> critical points in the development schedule.  Making them
> release-blocking deliverables would attract greater attention and
> scrutiny from release engineering and ensure that a Fedora development
> cycle does not proceed with broken or outdated or missing
> <code>fedora-toolbox</code> images.

I'd like to note that making this blocking doesn't waive any kind of
magic wand that makes our infrastructure more reliable. ;) 
The container build pipeline is a long collection of fragile things. 
It may well result in us slipping more based on things not working. ;( 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux