Re: F39 proposal: BiggerESP (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> said:
> Read-only drivers, which are the only drivers under discussion here, aren't a per se problem because they can't modify the file system. So they have no complaints about that.

But those read-only drivers are incomplete and problematic, especially
as filesystems get more complex.  I've been bitten before by an
ill-timed unclean shutdown, where an update was still in the /boot ext4
journal but not comitted, so the system would not boot, because the
GRUB2 ext4 driver doesn't read the journal.

There should be _less_ put into GRUB2 filesystem support IMHO, not more.
No more complex filesystems; keep /boot something simple like ext2 that
GRUB2 can reasonably be expected to handle basically 100%, possibly
mounted read-only during normal operation, mount with "sync", and with
all updates as atomic as practical.

-- 
Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux