Re: F39 proposal: BiggerESP (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



  Hi,

> If we want to change the default here, let's do some proper cleanup:
> 1. the split between ESP and XBOOTLDR is only useful in the case where
>    ESP already existed and was small. If the installer is *creating*
>    an ESP, it should just make it large enough.

And install kernels to /boot/efi in case /boot is not a XBOOTLDR
filesystem?

> 2. having a second partition with a second (different) file system
>    implementation just increases the footprint and attack surface for
>    no gain. If we create XBOOTLDR, make it like the ESP (i.e. VFAT
>    in almost all realistic scenarios).

While being at it also give the XBOOTLDR the correct type uuid according
to the discoverable partitions spec.

take care,
  Gerd
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux