Re: F39 proposal: BiggerESP (Self-Contained Change proposal)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Wed, May 10, 2023, at 9:42 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:

> You are arguing here into two opposing directions. One one hand you
> want to chainload multiple kernels+initrd (claiming this was a good idea out
> of the problem of sizing ESP/XBOOTLDR sufficientlly), and then on the
> other hand you claim there's too much kernel+initrd in the boot
> process?
>
> What is it now? Pick one: more initrd or less initrd?

I've only ever said I want faster boot and smaller initrd. Everything else is pointing out the consequences of alternatives, not advocacy of them.


-- 
Chris Murphy
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux