On Fri, Mar 3, 2023 at 2:34 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Fri, Mar 3 2023 at 12:03:12 PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé > <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Yes, this whole episode makes me want to kill off i686 builds of > > everything > > I maintain, even when its not a leaf package. I only spent time > > investigating > > the root cause in gnutls because I saw valgrind warnings and wanted > > to be > > sure there wasn't a security flaw lurking that would impact x86_64 > > too. I > > have absolutely no interest in spending resources to retrofit 64-bit > > time_t > > to a build target that ceased to be relevant to the overwhealming > > majority > > of Fedora users many years ago. > > If the i686 builds only exist for Steam and Wine, can we say users > should switch to containerized distributions instead (e.g. flatpak, > snap, or whatever)? Does it really makes sense to build all the various > dependencies of these applications in an age where containers exist? While I agree to some extent (the "unofficial" Steam flatpak from flathub works quite well), I don't think dropping wine is a good idea. As far as I know, it's used to run tests in some MinGW packages. Fabio _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
