Re: gnutls time_t breakage on i686

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 3 2023 at 12:03:12 PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, this whole episode makes me want to kill off i686 builds of everything I maintain, even when its not a leaf package. I only spent time investigating the root cause in gnutls because I saw valgrind warnings and wanted to be sure there wasn't a security flaw lurking that would impact x86_64 too. I have absolutely no interest in spending resources to retrofit 64-bit time_t to a build target that ceased to be relevant to the overwhealming majority
of Fedora users many years ago.

If the i686 builds only exist for Steam and Wine, can we say users should switch to containerized distributions instead (e.g. flatpak, snap, or whatever)? Does it really makes sense to build all the various dependencies of these applications in an age where containers exist?

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux