Re: gnutls time_t breakage on i686

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 03, 2023 at 12:56:27PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Daniel P. Berrangé:
> 
> > AFAICT, Fedora either keeps 32-bit time_t, or kills i686 for good.
> 
> I agree with this position.
> 
> For additional details, here is what I wrote in the other thread
> (regarding defaulting time64):
> 
> | That still needs some per-package work (mainly for scripting languages
> | using FFI) because dlsym for gettimeofday etc. still find the 32-bit
> | variant.  There are various ways we can hack around that, I guess.
> | 
> | Anyway, this dual ABI break (for off_t and time_t) needs to be proposed
> | as a Fedora change, and we can discuss mechanics if Fedora wants to move
> | in that direction.  I think this is far from a given because a
> | still-unknown amount of third-party software will break.  GNUTLS, for
> | example, used to have a fairly stable ABI: libgnutls.so.30 goes back a
> | couple of years; I think it was part of CentOS 7 already.
> | 
> | I think the first step is to decide if we want to do this.  After that,
> | we can discuss mechanics.  For example, traditionally, ABI changes like
> | this have not been implemented through build flags injection in Fedora,
> | rather we updated the toolchain defaults.
> | 
> | Needless to say, I have very little interest to work on this (I consider
> | all this a pointless distraction, to be blunt), but I guess I can help
> | with toolchain enablement.

Yes, this whole episode makes me want to kill off i686 builds of everything
I maintain, even when its not a leaf package. I only spent time investigating
the root cause in gnutls because I saw valgrind warnings and wanted to be
sure there wasn't a security flaw lurking that would impact x86_64 too. I
have absolutely no interest in spending resources to retrofit 64-bit time_t
to a build target that ceased to be relevant to the overwhealming majority
of Fedora users many years ago.

With regards,
Daniel
-- 
|: https://berrange.com      -o-    https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :|
|: https://libvirt.org         -o-            https://fstop138.berrange.com :|
|: https://entangle-photo.org    -o-    https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux