Re: Would it be useful to have a video call to discuss the "Deprecate Legacy BIOS" Change proposal?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 14.4.2022 11:42, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:

For example EU has regulation that requires vendors to have spare parts
available for 7–10 years after date of manufacturing so it makes sense
for the project to support hw no longer than a decade from the date of
it's manufacturing. ( which makes the oldest hw being support being
manufactured in 2012 ) and every process,workflows and decision being
bound by that.
Lack of availability of original spare parts does not mean that the hardware
suddenly magically stops working for everybody.

No but it does mean that they cant run indefinitely

And there needs to be a number on this to adjust users expectation and 10 years is a reasonable number from a business, parts and recycle/re-use availability,

What is unreasonable is to be expecting that it's supported indefinitely from OS and or HW vendors.

JBG
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux