On Thu, Apr 14, 2022 at 10:01:30AM +0200, Ralf Corsépius wrote: > > > Am 13.04.22 um 20:05 schrieb David Cantrell: > > > The Legacy BIOS SIG is a good proposal to handle this sort of ongoing work in > > Fedora. > > I do not agree with this statement. Like previous "Legacy SIGs" this is a > red herring to obfuscate RHATs lack of disinterest with topics, which do not > match into their business objectives. Really? Fedora is mainly a volunteer effort, someone has to do the work. SIG is a good solution. RedHat is under no obligation to work on everything. -- Tomasz Torcz “Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station tomek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx wagon filled with backup tapes.” — Jim Gray _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
