Ralf Corsépius wrote: > I do not agree with this statement. Like previous "Legacy SIGs" this is > a red herring to obfuscate RHATs lack of disinterest with topics, which > do not match into their business objectives. I am also worried that this is just a delayed retirement, as it was for 32- bit i686, where the SIG was very quickly declared a failure, without even being given time to organize. Still, it is better than retiring it immediately. But like you, I am worried that this is not really a long-term commitment and that people will be attempting to kill BIOS support again at even the smallest dent in SIG activity. Kevin Kofler _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure