On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 09:06:01AM -0600, Chris Adams wrote:
> So I guess this is the part I don't really understand (and I guess why I
> don't see this proposal as a "win") - how is i686 painful to package
> maintainers for non-delivered packages? Maybe I'm just missing
> something, but what causes issues?
>
Some of the Facebook/Meta open source projects I maintain are written with
only 64-bit platforms in mind, and I certainly appreciate the blanket
approval to drop %{ix86} without having to file a tracking bug.
Best regards,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities: https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
