Once upon a time, Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> said: > Package maintainers who would benefit from dropping i686 from their > packages probably already know that i686 is painful for them. So I guess this is the part I don't really understand (and I guess why I don't see this proposal as a "win") - how is i686 painful to package maintainers for non-delivered packages? Maybe I'm just missing something, but what causes issues? Basically - why would I as a package maintainer care about excluding i686? The effort involved for some packages to make sure they're just a leaf (so it'd be okay to exclude i686) just doesn't really seem worth it, if there's no practical gain for the maintainer. I apologize that my earlier email was attacking; my usual inclination is not to take small steps when there's really a bigger step that would be better in the big picture, and I didn't communicate that well. -- Chris Adams <linux@xxxxxxxxxxx> _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
