On 09. 03. 22 15:51, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 9:57 PM Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
(snip)
I think we are all misinterpreting the intention of this change proposal.
We are suggesting better ways to get rid of i686. And the arguments are valid.
However, I now think that this change proposal was not proposed to get rid of
i686, not even to get rid of most of the i686 packages. Indeed, there are more
sophisticated ways to do that -- OTOH volunteers don't seem to exactly pile up.
I think this change proposal has a different goal in mind. A simpler goal. Goal
that requires no volunteers:
Give maintainers a blanket approval to exclude i686 if it bothers them in any
way and their package is a leaf i686 package. That is it. Will this speed up
eventual i686 retirement? Possibly, but not much. But that is not the goal. The
goal is to clearly communicate: It is OK to drop this, you don't need to ask
for permissions or file bugzillas, just make sure you don't break anything (and
here's how you check if you are not breaking anything).
Is that correct, Fabio?
If so, I think it is actually a good thing to do. It won't solve the big
elephant in the room, but it has the potential to ease packaging for some.
Yes. That's the whole point...
OK then, I can +1 that, but please: Make that more obvious in the proposal.
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
