Re: ESP Ghostscript 8.x for FC5

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 6/8/05, Neal Becker <ndbecker2@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> This is x86_64 system, so it's a little more complicated.  There are both
> i386 and x86_64 ghostscript.  Any more ideas on debugging this?  I'm sure
> this is not just a problem for my setup, it should give the same result on
> any x86_64 system with everything installed.

do you have something installed that specifically needs the 32bit
ghostscript on your system?
If i were a betting man, I bet that you can isolate it to the 32bit
ghostscript not being updated as well or something. If you can get the
32bit version uninstalled.. does the yum update go smoothly?

 I dont have 64bit hardware so I can't directly help with confirming
or troubleshooting this.

-jef"
me: I'd like to buy a 64bit amd computer
her: why?
me: to uhm.. help other people on the internet troubleshoot theirs
her: <eye-roll>
"spaleta

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux