Tim Waugh wrote: > (Dropping fedora-test-list, since this is not relevant on that list.) > > ESP Ghostscript 8.15rc3 is now in the development tree. This is > targetted at Fedora Core 5. Please help test it out and see if I've > missed anything. > > I'm particularly interested in any regressions compared to the Fedora > Core 4 package (ghostscript-7.07-40). > > On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 07:35:12AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > >> Transaction Check Error: file /usr/bin/bdftops from install of >> ghostscript-8.1 >> 5-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40 >> [Lots more similar conflicts] > > This is because you have something that still requires something that > the old ghostscript provides. Do you have ImageMagick < 6.2.2.0-3 > perhaps? > > Tim. > */ for file in $(rpm -q --whatrequires ghostscript); do echo "..." $file && ( rpm -q --requires$file | grep ghostscript; ); done ... ghostscript-fonts-5.50-13 ghostscript ... hpijs-1.7.1-3 ghostscript ... gnome-print-0.37-11 ghostscript ghostscript-fonts ... ghostscript-devel-7.07-40 ghostscript = 7.07-40 ... ghostscript-gtk-7.07-40 ghostscript = 7.07-40 ... system-config-printer-0.6.131-1 ghostscript >= 6.51-16 ... gsview-4.6-10 ghostscript >= 7.07-15.3 ... libgnomeprint22-2.10.3-1 ghostscript ghostscript-fonts ghostscript ghostscript-fonts ... libgnomeprint22-2.10.3-1 ghostscript ghostscript-fonts ghostscript ghostscript-fonts ... scribus-1.2.1-5 ghostscript >= 7.07 Looks like the culprits are ghostscript-fonts and ghostscript-gtk -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
