Neal Becker wrote: > Tim Waugh wrote: > >> (Dropping fedora-test-list, since this is not relevant on that list.) >> >> ESP Ghostscript 8.15rc3 is now in the development tree. This is >> targetted at Fedora Core 5. Please help test it out and see if I've >> missed anything. >> >> I'm particularly interested in any regressions compared to the Fedora >> Core 4 package (ghostscript-7.07-40). >> >> On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 07:35:12AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: >> >>> Transaction Check Error: file /usr/bin/bdftops from install of >>> ghostscript-8.1 >>> 5-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40 >>> [Lots more similar conflicts] >> >> This is because you have something that still requires something that >> the old ghostscript provides. Do you have ImageMagick < 6.2.2.0-3 >> perhaps? >> >> Tim. >> */ > for file in $(rpm -q --whatrequires ghostscript); do echo "..." $file && > ( rpm -q --requires$file | grep ghostscript; ); done > ... ghostscript-fonts-5.50-13 > ghostscript > ... hpijs-1.7.1-3 > ghostscript > ... gnome-print-0.37-11 > ghostscript > ghostscript-fonts > ... ghostscript-devel-7.07-40 > ghostscript = 7.07-40 > ... ghostscript-gtk-7.07-40 > ghostscript = 7.07-40 > ... system-config-printer-0.6.131-1 > ghostscript >= 6.51-16 > ... gsview-4.6-10 > ghostscript >= 7.07-15.3 > ... libgnomeprint22-2.10.3-1 > ghostscript > ghostscript-fonts > ghostscript > ghostscript-fonts > ... libgnomeprint22-2.10.3-1 > ghostscript > ghostscript-fonts > ghostscript > ghostscript-fonts > ... scribus-1.2.1-5 > ghostscript >= 7.07 > > Looks like the culprits are ghostscript-fonts and ghostscript-gtk > Sorry, that's ghostscript-devel and ghostscript-gtk. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
