Tim Waugh wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 09:37:52AM -0400, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > >> Does he perhaps have some odd multilib issue? My x86 system installs >> the ghostscript fine. His x86_64 system might be running into a >> 32bit/64bit parallel package install issue. He might need to coax the >> arch information out of rpm when doing any queries to make sense of >> it. > > Ah, I bet it's because of this: > > $ rpm -qp --provides ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.1.x86_64.rpm > X11.so()(64bit) > config(ghostscript) = 8.15-0.rc3.1 > libgs.so.8()(64bit) > libijs-0.35.so()(64bit) > libijs.so > ghostscript = 8.15-0.rc3.1 > > I had to put 'Provides: libijs.so' in the spec file explicitly, > because for some reason it is not picked up automatically. Of course, > for the x86_64 package it should be libijs.so()(64bit). > > Tim. > */ If you can provide me a fixed package I'd be happy to try it. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
