Tim Waugh wrote: > On Wed, Jun 08, 2005 at 09:19:53AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote: > >> Sorry, that's ghostscript-devel and ghostscript-gtk. > > But they are both sub-packages of ghostscript, and so should both be > updated as well as ghostscript. > > Tim. > */ This is x86_64 system, so it's a little more complicated. There are both i386 and x86_64 ghostscript. Any more ideas on debugging this? I'm sure this is not just a problem for my setup, it should give the same result on any x86_64 system with everything installed. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
