On Sun, 2005-06-05 at 22:08 +0200, Miloslav Trmac wrote: > On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 03:59:42PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > > I quoted Daniel's 18 month remark b/c I was feeling pissy and b/c he was > > trying to counter my claim of red hat not having anything other than a 6 > > month release cycle to go on with rhel's release cycle, which I think is > > a red herring for the discussion of fedora. > Maybe the people really suggest a branch for the work you are talking > about - without realizing that the work "has to" happen by FC5 because > the promise that it will happen by FC5 ended the one of the previous > rounds of flamewars. good point. :) -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list