> OK. I misunderstood your proposal when you chose to quote off of > Daniel's message about 18 month. Had you continued from the 9 month > proposal, I would have continued reading, with interest. I apologize > for misinterpreting your intent. I quoted Daniel's 18 month remark b/c I was feeling pissy and b/c he was trying to counter my claim of red hat not having anything other than a 6 month release cycle to go on with rhel's release cycle, which I think is a red herring for the discussion of fedora. I do not advocate an 18month cycle for fedora, that'd be nuts and would defeat one of the reasons I like using fedora, which is to know that it will run on recent/newer hardware. All I'm arguing for is 3 extra months for the time b/t FC4 and FC5 to give us some time to catch up on some items that need doing. -sv -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
