On Sun, Jun 05, 2005 at 03:59:42PM -0400, seth vidal wrote: > I quoted Daniel's 18 month remark b/c I was feeling pissy and b/c he was > trying to counter my claim of red hat not having anything other than a 6 > month release cycle to go on with rhel's release cycle, which I think is > a red herring for the discussion of fedora. Maybe the people really suggest a branch for the work you are talking about - without realizing that the work "has to" happen by FC5 because the promise that it will happen by FC5 ended the one of the previous rounds of flamewars. Mirek -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
