seth vidal wrote: > But if hobbyists cannot participate in development b/c the cycle is just > too fast, well then it's not too terribly useful for us, is it. I don't buy this argument at all. So what if the changes you're working on don't go in the next release? They can still go into the one after that. There will always be cutoff points and a more frequent release cycle is actually the only mean to ensure a feature can get wide exposure by being part of the distribution. -- ➧ Ulrich Drepper ➧ Red Hat, Inc. ➧ 444 Castro St ➧ Mountain View, CA ❖
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
