On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 7:35 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 9:20 PM Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > "$BOOT must be a file system readable by the firmware" > > > > That condition is met by efifs, ergo by wrapping GRUB file system > > modules as EFI file system drivers. For non-UEFI, in effect, the spec > > insists that $BOOT is FAT. And I think that's fine for systemd-boot to > > implement a subset of the spec and have such a requirement, it is not > > OK for the spec to have arbitrary requirements. > > > > > > We do have those packaged in Fedora: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/efifs Cool! > We also would need these EFI binaries signed in order for the firmware > to load them. Yep. -- Chris Murphy _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
