On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 9:20 PM Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Sat, Apr 10, 2021 at 3:55 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel > <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > On 10.04.2021 23:16, PGNet Dev wrote: > > > https://systemd.io/BOOT_LOADER_SPECIFICATION/#type-1-boot-loader-specification-entries > > > https://www.freedesktop.org/software/systemd/man/systemd-boot.html > > > > I think the Extended Boot Loader Partition is not suitable for Fedora > > yet because it does not support symlinks (FAT32 by specification) > > "$BOOT must be a file system readable by the firmware" > > That condition is met by efifs, ergo by wrapping GRUB file system > modules as EFI file system drivers. For non-UEFI, in effect, the spec > insists that $BOOT is FAT. And I think that's fine for systemd-boot to > implement a subset of the spec and have such a requirement, it is not > OK for the spec to have arbitrary requirements. > > We do have those packaged in Fedora: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/efifs The GRUB2 sources being used as an input is wrong, though. It should be using the ones from the rhboot fork: https://github.com/rhboot/grub2/commits/fedora-35 We also would need these EFI binaries signed in order for the firmware to load them. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
