* Paul Wouters: > On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Petr Menšík wrote: > >> Wouldn't it be much simpler, if I could just dnf remove systemd-resolved >> in case I don't want it? > > In the past I also mentioned this. The overwhelming majority of installs > do not gain any benefit from te systemd-resolved service. Most servers, > containers and even workstations are installed and given DNS > configurations via DHCP, manager by a network administrator. I think a local cache is very beneficial to most users. The novel DNS request routing is problematic. Ideally Fedora would have a local cache by default, but keep the old way of routing DNS requests. In my opinion, just getting rid of systemd-resolved is not the right way forward. We should really keep the local cache aspect of it. So an outright removal of the service is not an answer, we'd need a replacement for the cache part. (A separate subpackage probably makes sense for other reasons.) Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
