Re: [dns-sig] Re: split-DNS, resolvconf on Fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 22 Feb 2021, Petr Menšík wrote:

Wouldn't it be much simpler, if I could just dnf remove systemd-resolved
in case I don't want it?

In the past I also mentioned this. The overwhelming majority of installs
do not gain any benefit from te systemd-resolved service. Most servers,
containers and even workstations are installed and given DNS
configurations via DHCP, manager by a network administrator.

systemd-resolved addresses a problem with finding printers and resolving
a .box domain for router reconfiguration. And it provides partial
solutions for split-DNS views when VPN's are deployed on laptops.

There is no technical reason why this is not in its own package. There
has been some focussing on reducing minimal installs, and this is a
prime candidate for that. I'm fine with the workstation or desktop
installs bringing this package in by default. But I see only potential
harm from installing it on servers, containers and most virtual machines.

Paul
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux