On Wed, Feb 24, 2021 at 08:14:17AM +0100, Ondrej Dubaj wrote: > Brian, > > you are right there are some changes which are now backward compatible. > That's the reason why we need cross-component cooperation from other > maintainers to detect these pieces and potentially report them to upstream > and see if they are willing to fix them. Another option is also to create a > compat package for autoconf-2.69 for f35, but it can lead to a result, > where some of the maintainers/upstreams will never use autoconf-2.71. I think we need to create a 2.69 compat package. I certainly have no current plans to switch upstream parted to 2.71 and while I now have a wonderful 1.8M patch that fixes it for Fedora I'd rather just use the upstream tar release with 2.69 until we're comfortable moving. Having 2.71 available is valuable, so both should be packaged, but it should not be a requirement at this point. Brian -- Brian C. Lane (PST8PDT) - weldr.io - lorax - parted - pykickstart _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
