Reading along, it's _at_best_ unclear what the eventual 'resolution' of this^ is. What _is_ clear is that there's significant disagreement -- which, unfortunately, has at times here become nasty & personal -- about needed vs planned functionality, and, of late, regulatory compliance. And, iiuc, though obviously very much up in the air, this is all relevant to F33 release, coming in weeks? Can someone please clarify, ideally with some level of certainty: If we've F32 systems in place, that do NOT use systemd-resolved &/or NetworkManager, but rather our own/preferred DNS client implementations with systemd-networkd, will a system *upgrade*, from F32 to F33, force/require any changes to those configurations? or will systems be left as-is, and we can expect uninterrupted functionality? which of these proposed systemd-resolved system-wide changes are NON-optional in _usage_? can they _all_ be turned-off/disabled? bottom-line -- how much system breakage of existing infrastructure, if any, should we be planning for with a F32 -> F33 upgrade path? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
