On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 12:15 PM PGNet Dev <pgnet.dev@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Reading along, it's _at_best_ unclear what the eventual 'resolution' of this^ is. > > What _is_ clear is that there's significant disagreement -- which, unfortunately, has at times here become nasty & personal -- about needed vs planned functionality, and, of late, regulatory compliance. > > And, iiuc, though obviously very much up in the air, this is all relevant to F33 release, coming in weeks? > > Can someone please clarify, ideally with some level of certainty: > > If we've F32 systems in place, that do NOT use systemd-resolved &/or NetworkManager, but rather our own/preferred DNS client implementations with systemd-networkd, > > will a system *upgrade*, from F32 to F33, force/require any changes to those configurations? or will systems be left as-is, and we can expect uninterrupted functionality? > > which of these proposed systemd-resolved system-wide changes are NON-optional in _usage_? can they _all_ be turned-off/disabled? > > bottom-line -- how much system breakage of existing infrastructure, if any, should we be planning for with a F32 -> F33 upgrade path? If you're not using NetworkManager, this change has _zero_ impact. -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
