On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 13:05, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 09:44:13AM -0700, Andrew Lutomirski wrote:
> After reading https://github.com/systemd/systemd/issues/8967, I really
> don't think that systemd-resolved's benefits outweigh its harms as a
> default resolver for Fedora. If someone wants to write a
> libfriendlydnsresolver and encourage/patch programs to use it instead of
> using glibc's resolver or reading resolv.conf, then that could be debated
> on its merits. But the actual contents of /etc/resolv.conf should follow
> the relevant standards, and systemd-resolved does not.
>
> Perhaps systemd-resolved could change its mind and decide to comply with
> all relevant standards. But until then, it seems inappropriate to me for
> it to be the default in Fedora.
Pfff, now I'm confused. Here is a case where systemd-resolved implements the
standard, and some people were unhappy because they were relying on sloppy
implementations which don't follow the RFC. Nevertheless, we added an opt-in
switch to make this work. (Since this feature mostly matters in "special"
setups like k8s, where you need to do a lot of local setup anyway, requiring
a one-line option seems to be reasonable).
Hey for those of us in the peanuts gallery watching this play out.. could each of you point out which standards and RFC you are complying too. There are a lot of ones and funny enough.. they don't all agree with each other at times.
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
