On 6/29/20 7:59 AM, David Kaufmann wrote:
Unfortunately I think this arguing is moot, as the issue seems to have been decided already anyway. I only remember one change "proposal" to actually being pulled back in the last year, and I'm really disappointed about having fake discussions on devel@ whilst the decision has already been made. There are some where the Change proposal owner actually considers other options which come up in the discussion, but for a few of them there is not even an answer, and for some of them the only Change proposal owner response is "but it is the best option".
I would like to respectfully disagree---my recollection is that when there was a vigorous opposition, the proposals were changed/retracted. In this particular case, it feels to me that the responses are mostly in favor, so it may be that this proposal is going against your preference, but this is good--it's how the system is supposed to work.
I am always always impressed by the discussion's high caliber and information content--I tend to learn a lot. My recollection is that proposals are being changed as a result.
I hope you can see it in a different light--as an opportunity to improve, not as an imposition. I am certainly glad that those proposals are in our workflow---thanks Ben, and the proposal authors!
Very Respectfully p. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
