On 07. 04. 20 0:47, Justin Forbes wrote:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 5:24 PM Miro Hrončok<mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 06. 04. 20 23:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
* Clarify that the time limit on PRs is only for determining if the
maintainer is responsive. If they reply, the timer is cleared.
As a side note (probably out of scope of this proposal), I think that if we have
RHEL packages in Fedora with not very responsive maintainers, the RHEL
maintainer should really try to get themselves involved in those (or start being
responsive in case the RHEL maintainers are the Fedora maintainers).
I think that is a desired side effect of ELN.
I hope it is. What I try to say is that if we "ignore" that packagers are not
responsive by merging the fix and going away, we are postponing the problem.
Instead (or better: in addition to that), we should nudge the appropriate RHEL
maintainers to offer help with the Fedora package (and initiate the
nonresponsive maintainer procedure if that is the only way to participate).
With special emphasis on RHEL packagers who "maintain" the packages in Fedora,
but are not responding (which happens quite often frankly).
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
