Dne 06. 04. 20 v 23:53 Stephen Gallagher napsal(a): > I've just published a fourth version[1] of the ELN proposal. With a > lot of input from Miro Hrončok, I think I've finally been able to > clarify some of the points that we were getting hung up on. > > Changes in this version of the proposal[2]: > Thank you. I don't have any real concerns ATM. Just a few remarks bellow. > * Clarify the relationship with Rawhide To my taste, there are quite a lot of remarks such as "If the package will never build in ELN, then the Rawhide version of it will simply be present." I think I don't see how it will turn out in practice. So to say, this is not showstopper and I am fine with that. > * Better describe what happens if packages don't build on ELN Thank you for this paragraph: ~~~ If it would require conditionals to build in ELN and you do not wish to put them there, but you want to see how changes appear in RHEL, there will eventually be a way to maintain a fork of your package that will go into RHEL, but the details on this are still being worked out. ~~~ I think you will soon appreciate it. > * Added a section explaining how we will deal with side-tags Thank you for addressing this. However, could you please elaborate what will be the actual trigger to do rebuild of some package in ELN? It can't be `git push` if you take side-tags into account. So will it be tagging into 'rawhide' (f33 ATM)? Will it be mixture? How are you going to determine what is the appropriate commit hash? You possibly don't know yet ... Vít _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
