Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change Proposal: ELN Buildroot and Compose V4

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 3:46 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
...
> > * Added a section explaining how we will deal with side-tags
>
>
> Thank you for addressing this.
>
> However, could you please elaborate what will be the actual trigger to
> do rebuild of some package in ELN? It can't be `git push` if you take
> side-tags into account. So will it be tagging into 'rawhide' (f33 ATM)?
> Will it be mixture? How are you going to determine what is the
> appropriate commit hash? You possibly don't know yet ...

I need to investigate how much of it will be net-new work, but we
intend to rely on fedora-messaging notifications to trigger the
rebuilds. Tagging into F33 is probably our best bet; we do actually
have the ability to query Koji for which commit hash was used to run
the build, so we can rely on that. The exact mechanism here is TBD,
but I wanted to make sure the intent of the design was covered in the
Change Proposal.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux