On Wed, Apr 1, 2020, 7:53 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 3:39 pm, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> Is the FOSS position adequately represented on the Council?
From my reading of [1], the Council decision is that we use FOSS in
our infrastructure except where it is "not viable and not available."
In the case of dist-git, it seems undeniable that FOSS is both viable
and available (whether it's Pagure or GitLab CE). Council hasn't
actually approved a move to a proprietary version of GitLab yet afaik.
[1]
https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/teams/council/council.2020-04-01-14.00.log.html
For a solution to be viable it needs to meet requirements.
--
Paul
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx