On Wed, 2020-04-01 at 20:16 -0400, Paul Frields wrote: > On Wed, Apr 1, 2020, 7:53 PM Michael Catanzaro <mcatanzaro@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 3:39 pm, Chris Murphy <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote: > > > Is the FOSS position adequately represented on the Council? > > > > From my reading of [1], the Council decision is that we use FOSS in > > our infrastructure except where it is "not viable and not available." > > In the case of dist-git, it seems undeniable that FOSS is both viable > > and available (whether it's Pagure or GitLab CE). Council hasn't > > actually approved a move to a proprietary version of GitLab yet afaik. > > > > [1] > > > > https://meetbot-raw.fedoraproject.org/teams/council/council.2020-04-01-14.00.log.html > > For a solution to be viable it needs to meet requirements. Sure. That's just a re-statement of the question. Are there Fedora requirements here which are met by proprietary Gitlab but not by Gitlab CE or Pagure? -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net http://www.happyassassin.net _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
