On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:26 AM Vít Ondruch <vondruch@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Dne 01. 04. 20 v 14:33 Alex Scheel napsal(a): > > ----- Original Message ----- > >> From: "Panu Matilainen" <pmatilai@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 6:22:39 AM > >> Subject: Re: CPE Git Forge Decision > >> > >>> I also appreciate that as a community developing our own solutions is > >>> something important and something that seems to matter a lot, but we > >>> have to realize that the development and maintenance effort cannot be > >>> carried out by the CPE team any more. Maybe this is a opportunity to > >>> create a SIG or a working group for people that are interested to carry > >>> on this effort. > >> But this is precisely at the heart of the problem: people feel they were > >> not given an opportunity to lend a hand, and that now its too late > >> because the messaging is that we go with GitLab, no matter what. > > Pagure has huge developer experience bugs filed against it for many > > years. Where have all these contributors been? Are those of us who really > > dislike Pagure's workflows in the minority? > > > Since you are asking, for dist-git and for ticket tracking in Fedora, > Pagure is much better than what we ever had and with one exception (I am > missing easy access to history of a file), there is not missing anything > substantial. > We're getting this on the next Pagure upgrade: https://stg.pagure.io/rpm-packages/pagure/history/pagure.spec -- 真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth! _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
