Rahul Sundaram <metherid@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > Hi > > On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 10:46 AM Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: > >> >> Welcome to our lives! >> If it was mathematically possible to go above 100% that's how much >> agreement you >> would have from us. >> > > If Red Hat is using Pagure internally, it is really odd to discuss > replacing Pagure with something else. The only viable replacement is > Gitlab which is a open code project written in a language that isn't a > strong fit for Fedora. Red Hat should be assigning more resources > (development & infrastructure) to add the features needed to extend Pagure > going forward and reduce the burden on the CPE team. Has CPE leadership > considered talking internally about that? I have to second this: why are we even *having* this discussion, when Pagure is used internally at RedHat and thus RedHat will require some form of maintenance anyway? Why is then the RedHat CPE team pushing to move away from Pagure, especially to Gitlab? Which albeit being a great platform, is written in Ruby and there's a lot less Ruby devs in the Fedora community than Python devs. Imho it would be a good idea that Pagure is not retired and is developed further, as it is currently one of its kind in many aspects and can be fully tweaked and customized to our needs without being huge in the way gitlab is. Cheers, Dan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
