Re: Modularity: The Official Complaint Thread

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Modular packages without defaults makes sense if they have
> dependencies on a non-default stream. For example: ReviewBoard depends
> on the Django:1.6 stream because of complicated upstream reasons. I
> have to choose between "modular without a default stream" or "not
> available on Fedora", because we have agreed on a prohibition on
> default streams with dependencies on non-default streams.

The right fix would be to package Django 1.6 as a parallel-installable 
compatibility package instead. I don't see why I cannot install ReviewBoard 
together with another Django web app on the same web server (without 
containers/VMs). (Admittedly a hypothetical example because I am running 
neither ReviewBoard nor another Django app on a server I maintain. I also do 
not run Fedora on a server. But if I were faced with this issue as a server 
administrator, I would curse loudly at Fedora and switch the server to a 
distribution that does not get in my way that way.)

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux