Re: [HEADS-UP]: Mercurial with Python3 on rawhide?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Seems evolve (tip) is not installable on python3:

python3 setup.py install --user
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "setup.py", line 37, in <module>
    version=get_version(),
  File "setup.py", line 15, in get_version
    return get_metadata()['__version__']
  File "setup.py", line 10, in get_metadata
    execfile(fullpath, meta)
NameError: name 'execfile' is not defined
[nbecker@nbecker2 evolve]$ hg id
8a491546e81d (stable) tip

On Sun, Sep 8, 2019 at 12:02 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 7:21 PM Petr Stodulka <pstodulk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > Hi guys,
> > I apologize that I mystified you a little in my prefious email when I wrote that
> > I resolved majority of problems. I looked at that closer today after 1.5w and
> > found that I have been near the start of all troubles. My memory just washed
> > that pain out.
> >
> > So I spend some time around and finally it looks that I am able to build at least
> > something. I guess that all extensions (including hgk, chg) are pretty broken
> > now as these will have to be build separately probably as well..
> >
> > The patch with POC of the py2 & py3 packages is here:
> >      https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1608765
> >
> > I think that the solution is pretty bad really (I mean, whole iday about
> > py2 & py3 rpms is wrong and maybe should be created new component that
> > will be conflicting with the mercurial - which should be ported to Py3 only).
> > Such solution would be more clean I guess, with proper Provides/Obsoletes.
> >
> > I will be offline again since the wednesday's night. Hopefully it helps
> > someone at least a little.
> >
>
> I was speaking to the Octobus guys on IRC about this, and the issues
> reported earlier about hg-git and evolve are fixed in the default
> branch tip, just not in a release yet. Can you try pulling snapshots
> for hg-git and evolve based on tip and see if the situation has
> improved?
>
> I'd rather just have us yank Python 2 entirely from the Mercurial
> stack. Barring that, it _is_ possible to make de-conflicted Python 2
> and Python 3 packages. I'd rather the Python 2 one be non-default no
> matter what, since we *are* removing the Python 2 stack in Fedora 32,
> full stop.
>
> If you need help with making less ugly versions of a py2+py3 packaging
> of Mercurial, I'd be happy to help there.
>
>
>
> --
> 真実はいつも一つ!/ Always, there's only one truth!



-- 
Those who don't understand recursion are doomed to repeat it
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux