On Tue, 18 Jun 2019 at 19:42, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
This has all worked just fine in the past, before it was decided to make
basically every single broken dependency fail the entire Rawhide compose.
Soname bumps did not even have to be announced, they would get announced by
the broken dependency report within less than 24 hours anyway, and then
eventually fixed (without somebody unrealistically expecting maintainers to
fix the broken dependency in less than 24 hours to make the next compose
succeed, which is just plain impossible for the average volunteer packager,
especially if source code changes are needed).
I am having a hard time reconciling the above with all the times you have angrily called out anyone who landed something broken in rawhide which affected what you wanted to do.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Stephen J Smoogen.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
