Le 2019-02-01 13:21, Mikolaj Izdebski a écrit :
On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:28 AM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 1/31/19 4:52 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
...snip...
> COPR was supposed to be that outlet, but no one gives a damn about it.
> Everyone complains that the service is "bad" and that the design is
> "bad" but no one wants to actually constructively improve it. The
> quality of service on COPR has fallen due to lack of care and
> unwillingness to invest, so what are we supposed to do? The horrible
I've heard you and some others say this, but can you perhaps expand on
it? How has quality of service of copr fallen?
There are some of current/recent major problems with COPR that did not
exist initially:
- builds failing due to failure to download packages from official
Fedora mirror dl.fedoraproject.org
- builds failing due to problems with keygen (was not a problem before
keygen was introduced)
- builds failing to import to COPR distgit (was not a problem before
dist-git was introduced)
And builds failing is just an annoyance when you are building a single
leaf package. When your build execution plan covers hundreds of
interdependent packages, with bootstrapping phases, having something
failing in the middle is not just an annoyance, it often means
restarting the full plan from scratch, because trying to salvage the
result manually is just too much work
Regards,
--
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
