On Fri, Feb 1, 2019 at 2:28 AM Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 1/31/19 4:52 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > > ...snip... > > > COPR was supposed to be that outlet, but no one gives a damn about it. > > Everyone complains that the service is "bad" and that the design is > > "bad" but no one wants to actually constructively improve it. The > > quality of service on COPR has fallen due to lack of care and > > unwillingness to invest, so what are we supposed to do? The horrible > > I've heard you and some others say this, but can you perhaps expand on > it? How has quality of service of copr fallen? There are some of current/recent major problems with COPR that did not exist initially: - builds failing due to failure to download packages from official Fedora mirror dl.fedoraproject.org - builds failing due to problems with keygen (was not a problem before keygen was introduced) - builds failing to import to COPR distgit (was not a problem before dist-git was introduced) - outages caused by read-only filesystem after reboot - copr is unusable until someone remounts it rw - multi-day long outages caused by out of disk space - multi-hour or even day- long build queues - outdated SOP preventing non-COPR people like me from fixing COPR outages -- Mikolaj _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
