On 1/31/19 4:52 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: ...snip... > COPR was supposed to be that outlet, but no one gives a damn about it. > Everyone complains that the service is "bad" and that the design is > "bad" but no one wants to actually constructively improve it. The > quality of service on COPR has fallen due to lack of care and > unwillingness to invest, so what are we supposed to do? The horrible I've heard you and some others say this, but can you perhaps expand on it? How has quality of service of copr fallen? There are times when a bunch of builds are dumped on it that it takes a bit to catch up, but it's usually like an hour not days or anything. Is it the build time you refer to? Or something(s) else? kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
