On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 05:09:24PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > Suprisingly, recently I've found use for modularity. It's a crutch > for bad software (OpenShift breaking backwards compatibility) but it > worked. I mean, software is software. :) > That's as an user. I'm still to discover the need for modularity > as a packager, but I'm not eager to. Solving problems for users should count as something! The thing I really want from it is: automatic builds across bases from one (or two) stream branches. That's partly there, but isn't as magical as I'd like it to be. -- Matthew Miller <mattdm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
