Re: Ursa Major (modules in buildroot) enablement

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> This is not about forcing modules unto people. The drive comes from
> the other direction: packages want to be available only as modules,

But that is exactly what I mean by "forcing modules onto people"!

> and this is a work-around to allow them to be used as build dependencies.
> So this change is driven by packagers who want to use modules for
> *their own packages*.

But I am speaking from a *user*'s standpoint, both end users of the package 
and maintainers of dependent packages. For them, if the maintainer of 
package foo decides to make package foo module-only, the maintainer *forces* 
modules onto everyone wanting to use foo on their system or for their 
package.

So making a package module-only is by definition forcing modules onto 
people. If you claim otherwise, you have a too maintainer-centric view of 
the issue and are not getting the whole picture.

> I'm with you in the sense that I too fail to see practical benefits of
> modules so far. But e.g. the java-sig says it makes their life easier,
> and it is their choice. The decision was made to proceed with
> modularity in Fedora.

And that was a mistake! But…

> Once that decision was made, we cannot forbid packagers from making use of
> the new functionality. This further step is only a natural consequence.

… that does not mean we need to go down that slippery slope. It is perfectly 
possible to allow modules only with some restrictions, e.g.:
* that packages on which other packages depend at build time or at runtime
  MUST NOT be module-only, or even
* that no package may ever be module-only, but modules can only be used for
  non-default versions.

But if Fedora thinks it does not make sense to have modules under such 
common-sense rules, then the decision to allow modules in the first place 
needs to be rethought and they should be deprecated immediately (i.e., no 
more modules in F30, no new modules in F29, and all module-only packages 
must return to the non-modular F29 updates repository).

        Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux